Talk:Lantingji Xu

This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The Further reading terms seem to have a typo of sorts. I can't find any reference online to Nakata, Yujiro. "The Masterpieces of Wang Xizhi and Wang Xianzhi." In Chinese Calligraphy, edited by Yujiro Nakata. Translated by Jeffery Hunter, 116 - 118. New York, Tokyo and Kyoto: Weatherhill/Tankosha, 1983. It is not used in the text as source so it isn't problematic but maybe if anyone else can't find such references either it should be deleted.

Untitled

i think, this article needs revising

Translation please

Is there somebody capable and friendly enough to translate the text. Thank you. --Immanuel Giel 10:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have translated the text, and placed it on wikisource under the title, Preface to the Poems Composed at the Orchid Pavilion. A-cai 09:40, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. --Immanuel Giel 13:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"a fusion of the Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism"

You know you're reading bad Sinological scholarship when something is described as (yet another) "fusion of the Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism." In fact, through its allusions, the text criticizes both Confucius (in the phrase 死生亦大矣) and Zhuangzi (一死生). Sometimes conventional wisdom about "harmonious fusion" is so strong that it leads people to ignore the text right in front of them. 98.115.255.240 (talk) 09:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]