Talk:Languages of Sweden

Sweden Top‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages C‑class

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Questions

1. Are there really that many students of Arabic, Japanese and Russian? I would expect the number as very small besides immigrant groups and/or university students. (The number of German, Spanish and French students is high, though, mostly because it's generally mandatory somewhere between late Primary school and Gymnasium to study a 3rd language. Many or most fail to learn the 3rd language to any usable level, though.)
2. Shouldn't the article mention something about major immigrant languages, such as Turkish, Arabic, Serbo-Croatian and Spanish etc. ? 惑乱分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * 00:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1. Also, I've read that Chinese also has become somewhat popular among lower grade students, maybe only at one or a few schools, but that's probably on the same level as Arabic and Russian, anyway. (Japanese is maybe somewhat more popular, due to its pop culture impact.) 惑乱分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * (talk) 19:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How to speak cat 2603:6080:15F0:2E40:5727:4B50:FE19:292 (talk) 20:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

80,000 "Scanian-speakers"

Also in this article the 80,000 speakers of Scanian are mentioned. Is there anyone out there who has the slightest idea who they are? The province has over 1,000,000 inhabitants. Most of them are born and raised there and they speak the dialect skånska, which is a regional variety of standard Swedish with some flavour of neighbouring Danish. But somewhere spread over the province there are 80,000 persons which are speaking this mysterious language. But who has really counted them and when was that count made? Are there any reliable sources? --Muniswede (talk) 22:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, by some observers, the more rural dialects are considered to be distinct enough to be classified as its own language, but still, there's a dialect continuum in these areas anyway, and the number seems grasped out of thin air. 惑乱分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * (talk) 14:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is a dialect continuum and some dialects are perhaps a bit more "old fashioned" than others. If they could be classified as an own language is another question. But the "some observers" who have grasped the number 80,000 must have come to this result in some way. It would be interesting to know how they have found it out. Nothing could be found on the Internet. Ethnologue mentions the number, but they do not present any source, however. It must be considered "original research", which cannot be verified. --Muniswede (talk) 19:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jamtlandic loanwords?

Are the Jamtlandic loanwords really worth mentioning? Standard Swedish has borrowed relatively extensively fromDanish,German and French, anyway, and for now it seems the dialect is more heavily influenced than standard Swedish. it would be more interesting to note the dialect's peculiarities. 惑乱分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * (talk) 18:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Immigrant languages" section

I have my doubts about the last section about immigrant languages. It sounds too much like ranting. I think the criterion of including only "native" minor languages had its basis in policies already formulated by the EU, not something the Swedish government itself had a major part in. 惑乱分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * (talk) 18:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. 惑乱分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * (talk) 00:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed section about the Baltics

I removed a section about the Baltic states, due to bad prose and irrelevant placing. If you find it to be appropriate, rephrase and insert in correct section:

In the early 2000s, Sweden experienced an influx of economic immigrants from Eastern Europe,
esp. the Baltic states restored their independence (Estonia, Latvia and
Lithuania) had searched for employment in Sweden, are required to learn the Swedish
language if they want to become permanent citizens or have temporary work permits.

惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 10:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Serious errors in map

The map showing the language areas in Sweden contains serious errors. Bilingual Meänkieli/Finnish-Swedish areas in the Torne Valley along the border of Finland are indicated as monolingual Swedish-speaking. These areas are even legally defined in the official Meänkieli-speaking area. The map needs to be redrawn. --88.193.41.159 (talk) 06:09, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

I performed an edit, thinking it would improve the article by removing redundancy (the same pie chart twice), but it had not benerfit, and may even have been detrimental by removing (written, excplicitly stated percentages) information (on self-reported knowledge of English). So I reverted. Can someone remove the double pie chart? I apologize for any damage to the article.--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 13:33, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Languages of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160106183351/http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf to http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Languages of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]