Talk:Languages of Mali

Africa: Mali Mid‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Mali portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mali (assessed as Top-importance).

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The lead sentence of this article says that French is "fairly widely understood." I'm not sure that that is accurate, unless perhaps it is conditioned ("... in urban areas" or "one can usually find at least one person who speaks at least some French," or some such precision).

A source I'm looking at for something else cites a figure of 15% of the population that speaks French (as a second language). Dutcher, Nadine. 2004. Expanding Educational Opportunity in Linguistically Diverse Societies, 2nd. ed. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. http://www.cal.org/resources/pubs/expand.html (open the PDF and it's on p. 79).

Beyond all that, a phrase like "fairly widely understood" while harmless, gives a wide range to impressions or misimpressions by the reader. Not trying to nitpick here, but a rewrite would help - I'll try to get to it unless someone else gets to it first. --A12n 01:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By all means go ahead! I agree with you that the phrasing is too vague and probably misleading (btw, that's quite a funny description you give there, "one can usually find at least one person who speaks at least some French"). — mark ✎ 07:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Restructuring and edits

As of 2022 Bambara is the official language not french. Should be changed imo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:2001:8A30:355B:EEDC:ED25:34EE (talk) 22:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just rearranged some information and added a bit more. The intro is changed to more of an overview. I highlighted the de facto position of Bambara as the most widely used language. The term "national language" needs to be used with care since this is a legal category in Mali (and various other African countries; unfortunately the Wikipedia article on the subject does not yet cover this adequately). There still needs to be more info in several categories.--A12n 13:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New table

Just noticed the new table on languages of Mali in this article. Nice idea with potential for other pages, but I would suggest instead of "Minor indigenous languages" using "Other indigenous languages" (minor can be taken negatively), and instead of "Inter-ethnic languages" using "Languages of wider communication." If this table is generalized, "Regional languages" might also be used, either in the category "National languages" (i.e., "National or Regional languages") or with "Languages of wider communication." --A12n 05:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Main foreign languages" could be replaced by "Other important languages." Arabic, currently in this category, has been used in what is now Mali for a lot longer than French, which is not listed. Which is more foreign? Arabic for that matter has some indigenous speakers. --A12n 05:26, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and made some of these changes.--A12n 05:36, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another new table

I just added a table with all spoken languages listed for Mali in Ethnologue. This permits re-ordering the list by different headings, much like the smaller table on the Languages of Niger page. There is a problem with the sorting for the numbers in this table (not sure how to make it put order in numerical order, rather than alphabetizing by digit). Also need to put more links in the table. Comments & improvements welcome. --A12n 05:36, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I created the first table but this one is better. Thanks for the improvements! Aaker 23:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment. The info on where in the country the languages are spoken could be more pecise (referring to Malian administrative regions for example). Unfortunately it is hard to get good figures on second language speakership of most languages. ... There are several advantages, I think, to using the dynamic table, and it can be adapted to other countries as well (though some like Nigeria with many languages would be a challenge). --A12n 02:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Verifying actual wording on "national languages" of Mali

I am wondering, belatedly, about exactly how the statute in Mali defining the 13 "national languages" is worded. Is it ust the way Ethnologue reports it or something different as indicated in L'aménagement linguistique dans le monde. Quotes from the two sources are listed on the PanAfriL10n page on Mali (1.1.b). --A12n 08:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nine years later, I corrected names of the national languages. Nowhere in official documents I've seen is "Masina Fulfulde" or "Maasinankoore" listed as a national language. Rather it is "Fulfulde." That may in practice resolve to a Maasinankoore-based usage, but statutorily the reference is to what in ICT we'd call the "macrolanguage." Similarly, the texts refer to Bozo, Dogon, and Songhay, and not to specific varieties of them. --A12n (talk) 11:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring "Usage" section

Reverted "blanking" (which functionally is deletion) of Usage section by 207.190.85.98. Considering this section as an important part of the article. Suggest that such a major change should be discussed on this talk page, with one of the major questions being where this content would go if removal from this article is accepted.--A12n (talk) 19:18, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Languages of Mali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070314051428/http://www.panafril10n.org/wikidoc/pmwiki.php/PanAfrLoc/Mali to http://www.panafril10n.org/wikidoc/pmwiki.php/PanAfrLoc/Mali

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]