Talk:Languages of Belgium
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Has only 50% of the population in Brussels French as primary language? I really doubt that figure is correct. Aaker 22:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
The key word here is 'primary'. If you read the pdf-report linked in the third footnote, it makes more sense. Specifically, see the section entitled 'Brussels is no longer Belgium', indicating that only 44% of Brussels' residents are of Belgian descent. While well over 90% can speak French well or very well, for many it is only a secondary language. The exact figures are in the report.--Undyne (talk) 18:29, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Images
[edit]I have removed this image, because I think the one now at the top shows the language situation better. But I think we should add it back in if a "Linguistic history of Belgium" section gets added to this article. It would also be nice to have images of street signs in French and German for those sections. Lesgles (talk) 15:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- If and when it gets added back, I would request that the phrase historically more powerful be omitted. There are many reasons for the Language diversity in Belgium. However, the power of its neighbors is NOT one of them.--Buster7 (talk) 16:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed, that is nonsense.--Hooiwind (talk) 10:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- If and when it gets added back, I would request that the phrase historically more powerful be omitted. There are many reasons for the Language diversity in Belgium. However, the power of its neighbors is NOT one of them.--Buster7 (talk) 16:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
suggesting a change
[edit]Currently the Lead is as follows:
- Close to 60% of the country's population speaks Dutch as the primary (Belgian) language.[1] It is the official language of the Flemish Community and the Flemish Region (merged to Flanders) and, along with French, an official language of the Brussels-Capital Region. Though the Dutch language officially spoken in Belgium is identical with the one spoken in the Netherlands, it is often colloquially called Flemish. The main Dutch dialects spoken in Belgium are Brabantian, West Flemish, East Flemish and Limburgish. Many of the sub-dialects, while they may resemble standard Dutch, eminate from history and daily life and can be quite distant from the standard language. Words which are unique to Belgian Dutch are called belgicisms. The original Brabantian dialect of Brussels has been very heavily influenced by French, and in most cases replaced by it during the Frenchification of Brussels.
- In order to better describe the Language situation in Belgium, I suggest the following changes;
Of the inhabitants of Belgium, roughly 59% belong to the Flemish-speaking Community, 40% to the French-speaking Community and 1% to the German-speaking Community[1]. Though the Dutch language version officially spoken in Belgium is almost identical with the one spoken in the Netherlands, it is often colloquially called Flemish. Dutch is the official language of the Flemish Community and the Flemish Region (merged to Flanders) and, along with French, an official language of the Brussels-Capital Region. The main Flemish dialects spoken in Belgium are Brabantian, West Flemish, East Flemish and Limburgish. Many of the sub-dialects, while they may resemble standard Dutch, eminate from Belgian history and daily life and can be quite distant from the standard Dutch language. Words which are unique to Belgian Dutch are called belgicisms. The original Brabantian dialect of Brussels has been very heavily influenced by French, and in most cases replaced by it during the Frenchification of Brussels........--Buster7 (talk) 14:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Dear Buster, seriously. The only Flemish dialects are East Flemish and West Flemish (including French Flemish), related dialects spoken in the former County of Flanders, much smaller than today's Flanders. Other Dutch dialects (of the Dutch language) spoken in Belgium are Brabantian and Limburgish —spoken by a few million more in the Netherlands— so they do not "eminate from Belgian history". Also, there is no such thing as a Flemish-speaking Community, since there is no Flemish language (not even a variant common for all of Belgium), no matter what you may believe. You either say the Flemish Community (capital C), the Flemish people or the Dutch-speaking community (small c). So please —and this is not the first time— stop mixing up the terms Flemish and Dutch when talking about linguistics or languages. I really don't feel like having to keep a constant eye on you and User:SPQRobin, who seems to suffer from the same POV. Kind regards, --Hooiwind (talk) 10:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- There is a distinction that is negated when Flemish people are called Dutch...History calls us Flemish, not Dutch. Your vigil is appreciated, as is your point of view. Neither User:SPQRobin nor I are doing the mixing. Our attempt is to seperate the ingredients for the readers education. Regards.--Buster7 (talk) 13:21, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- I utterly agree Flemish people (in the modern sense of the word) are by no means Dutch people. In linguistic matters, however, Dutch is not a demomym proper to the Netherlands (in the modern sense of the word). Cheers, --Hooiwind (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ok. My opinion is that Flemish is a separate language. There's however a (political...) consensus that it's not. Though, as far as I know, there is a consensus that "Flemish dialects" refer to "dialects of [whole] Flanders". And btw, I don't like neither current and proposed text :-) Let's stop discussing endlessly about those things again and again... SPQRobin (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- As long as you realise your opinion is what you want to believe and not how it is, you can believe what you wish. "Flemish dialects" could mean "all dialects spoken in Flanders" but would be interpreted by many as "dialects of the Flemish language" (quod non). "Dutch dialects spoken in Flanders" is therefore less deliberately vague. We do speak different than the Dutch —thank God—, as do people in the Caribbean or Suriname, just like the Americans speak different than the English, but that does not mean we speak a different language (or that they speak a different language). Afrikaans in se may not be very different either but is considered a seperate language, simply because it is considered a seperate language. "Flemish" is not. This discussion will sadly only stop when attempts to spread this idea —be it explicitly or implicitly by writing things like "Flemish pronoun", "Flemish dialect", "in Flemish", "speak Flemish"— will have come to a halt. Regards, --Hooiwind (talk) 11:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ok. My opinion is that Flemish is a separate language. There's however a (political...) consensus that it's not. Though, as far as I know, there is a consensus that "Flemish dialects" refer to "dialects of [whole] Flanders". And btw, I don't like neither current and proposed text :-) Let's stop discussing endlessly about those things again and again... SPQRobin (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
References
- ^ a b Footnote: Of the inhabitants of Belgium, roughly 59% belong to the Flemish Community, 40% to the French Community and 1% to the German-speaking Community, though these figures relating to official Belgian languages include unknown numbers of immigrants and their children speaking a foreign language as primary language, and of infra-Belgium regional migrants which may be assumed to largely balance one another for natively French and Dutch speakers.
Add dialects in the German speaking region?
[edit]Should the dialects of the "German speaking Community" be added here? People living there speak Limburgish and Luxembourgish - quite strange, only Luxembourgish can be classified as a dialect of German.Johnny2323 (talk) 02:28, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
2012 Survey
[edit]Numbers on the infobox from 2005 have to be updated with 2012 survey here : http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf --Loup Solitaire 81 (talk) 13:06, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Actually the numbers are in this one: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_anx_en.pdf (at page 54 or T36)
Mother tongue:
Dutch 55
French 36
Arab 3
Turkish 2
Italian 2
Portuguese 1
German 0.4
Languages that you speak well enough in order to be able to have a conversation (other than mother tongue)
English 52
French 45
German 22
Dutch 13
Spanish 5
Italian 4
Russian 1
Arab 1
None 28
Nico (talk) 14:10, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Languages of Belgium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160106183351/http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf to http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070613234540/http://www.statbel.fgov.be/studies/ac699_en.pdf to http://www.statbel.fgov.be/studies/ac699_en.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Languages of Belgium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060823190132/http://regards.ires.ucl.ac.be/Archives/RE042.pdf to http://regards.ires.ucl.ac.be/Archives/RE042.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:22, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Romani
[edit]I am certain there are some Romani speakers in Belgium. Hell, the French Romani page ([1]) cites 10,000 Romani live there. It should definitely be added to this page... but, where? Which Romani language(s) is/are spoken in Belgium? Danachos (talk) 23:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)