Jump to content

Talk:Languages constructed by Tolkien/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

"Feeling" languages

Tolkien had the ability to feel languages? This statement rates an 11 on the fawning index.

agree & rephrase ;) dab 15:49, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Naffarin

What about Naffarin? From what I read in a Tolkien biography, it resembles Spanish but I don't know enough to include it in the list. -- Error 22:46, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Not a Middle-earth language, but rather his first 'real' conlang. While some Naffarin apparently made it into Qenya (early Quenya), it is not related to the Quendi in any way. Anárion 06:05, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Entish

the paragraphs on "Entish" should be moved to Entish language as they clog up the List of languages. dab 15:49, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Removed to a paragraph in Ent instead. [[User:Anárion|File:Anarion.png]] 16:08, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Erroneous article title

Middle-Earth is only one of the continents of the world in question, but this article also deals with languages exclusive to Aman (another continent). I would suggest that the entry be renamed Languages of Arda. --LRC 17:17, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Yes, the title Languages of Arda would be more appropriate. ~Leia~

Tolkienian Linguistics FAQ

The link to the "The Tolkienian Linguistics FAQ" is somewhat idiosyncratic in its presentation and perhaps should not have such a prominent position in the link list? Maybe it can stay where it is and be named "Elvish Linguistic Fellowship’s Tolkienian Linguistics FAQ" (or something similar) to reflect its singular viewpoint?

Artificial?

Actually, artificial meaning man-made means all languages are artificial because they were all created by men.

No, anonymous (@Lord Kyris Torchblade in 2006), "artificial" means "made by 'art'", that is, by intentional crafting. The stuff you flush down the toilet is made by man (in the sense "a human"), but it's natural, not artificial. The same for natural languages. --Thnidu (talk) 01:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

The list

I've read that orcs don't actually have a language but just alter other languages along with speaking Black Speech. so wouldn't it be a waste to have orcs there basically twice.

Arda or Middle-earth?

Shouldn't this article be named Languages of Middle-earth rather than languages of Arda? I think that it has been agreed on using Middle-earth for all articles concerning Tolkien's universe. Galadh 17:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

See above where it was previously moved from that name to this. I think 'Middle-earth' is fine as the term is often used to refer to the whole of Tolkien's creation (as it was by JRRT himself), but there'll always be a few pointing out the more precise definition. --CBDunkerson 21:37, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Philologist

Tolkien was a philologist and, in his mind, this was different from being a 'linguist'. In Letters, he states explicitly "I am not a linguist". Accordingly, I am changing linguist > philologist.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move to Languages constructed by J. R. R. Tolkien; no consensus for Tolkien's Elvish languages. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 12:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Languages of Arda → Tolkien's constructed languages — We are dealing here with a Fictional Universe created by J.R.R. Tolkien, author. If "Elves", "Arda", etc do not exist, the languages do. These "constructed languages" are not of or from "Middle-earth" or even "Arda" but from Tolkien's mind, from our World (since you can speak them, if you dare ;-)). When Tolkien created "Gnomish" (one of his first languages) he did not use the term "Middle-earth" at all in his novels, he used it about 15 years later, or "Arda", a very technical Elvish word, invented about 25 years later, and which only the core fans "know" (Arda means many things in Quenya, like our "Solar System". So technically speaking Martian is also a language from/of Arda! The casual reader has never heard of Arda probabaly. And some Elvish languages were not part or used in "Middle-earth". The "Quenya Vanyarin" dialect developped in Eldamar, not part of Middle-earth. Tolkien Invented these tongues not Elves. ;-) I'm new so I do not know how to create or redirect these to Tolkien's constructed languages and Tolkien's Elvish languages, sorry. 90.54.1.73 (talk) 00:45, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Okay by me. —Tamfang (talk) 04:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose Tolkien's Elvish languages I see no point in this move, it converts the title to a possessive form. It could easily be "Tolkienian Elvish languages" or some other form. Elf languages (Tolkien) would make more sense. 65.94.45.209 (talk) 12:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
    If you object to the possessive form like that, would 'languages consturcted by Tolkien' or closer to that be fine? Munci (talk) 18:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
    Langauges constructed by Tolkien is fine by me. Counterparted by Elf languages of Tolkien to match the titles? 65.94.45.209 (talk) 22:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
    I'm new here, sorry again, and I wonder who will decide? It is the last one who spoke (wrote)? Are we going to vote? "Elf language(s)"? Elf-tongue(s), Elven-language(s), Elvish-language(s), etc. are used by Tolkien, always with a "-" in "The Lord of the Rings". Languages constructed by Tolkien, sounds like good English to me, yes. But aren't we talking about "Constrcuted Languages", and not "Languages Constrcuted" here? "Quenya is a language contructed by ..." is fine in an English sentence but here we are talking about Lemma, the best Headword. Languages constructed by Tolkien is not apparopriate as a Headword, since you could add anything after: by Tolkien in his bath, by Tolkien in a plane, by Tolkien on a sunny day, etc. 90.54.1.73 (talk) 01:16, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Support removal of 'Arda' from title as per nom. Munci (talk) 18:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Partial support. I see nothing wrong with "Elvish languages (Middle-earth)". It's a perfectly good title, clear and recognizable, and IMO better than the suggested alternatives. However, I support moving "Languages of Arda", which IMO is not adequately descriptive. Does the MOS have s.t. against genitives in titles? How about just "Constructed languages (Tolkien)"? — kwami (talk) 01:21, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
    Elvish languages (Tolkien)? —Tamfang (talk) 01:55, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
    "Constructed languages (Tolkien)" does sound like a good idea. Munci (talk) 18:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC)-
  • Partial support. I agree with Kwamikagami, we should not move "Elvish languages (Middle-earth)". Middle-earth is a key word here that fits just fine into a title. Even if in-universe-Elvish is also spoken in Aman which is outside Middle-earth, the latter is too unknown to the general public. Therefore I too think we should remove Arda from the title over here as it is likewise too unknown. In List of constructed languages there's a section "Languages used in fiction" so I don't see anything wrong with a new title "Languages constructed by J. R. R. Tolkien" (let's use the initials too, not just the name); but a possesive form seems wrong to me. De728631 (talk) 01:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
    "Tibetan languages", is better than "Languages of Tibet" (and it is not the same thing, either). So "Tolkienian Languages" could do too, what do you think? And by the way, is there "rules" about Lemma/Headword?86.214.50.9 (talk) 01:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
There are some rules and guidelines at WP:Article titles. And I don't think that a lot of people can sort the term "Tolkienian". It's too specific again. De728631 (talk) 01:52, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
And "Languages of ..." is actually more or less a standard title for language articles on Wikipedia. We don't use adjectives. De728631 (talk) 01:56, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Partial support and comment. I agree on removing "Arda" as proposed. I believe a non-specialist looking for information would look for "Elvish", so I think "Elvish languages (J.R.R. Tolkien)" makes sense. And I like "Languages of Middle-earth (J.R.R. Tolkien)" for the broader article. Neither 'elvish' nor 'Middle-earth' is confined to JRRT's Legendarium, strictly speaking. (And 'Legendarium' is another in-crowd term we should avoid in titles, not that it has been suggested.) - PKM (talk) 07:25, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Well, if we use "Languages of Middle-earth (J.R.R. Tolkien)" with Middle-earth in it then we can as well keep "Elvish languages (Middle-earth)". De728631 (talk) 21:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
What noun to use for various collections from Tolkien's stories is a perennial (and IMO picayune) question. It really shouldn't matter as anyone searching Wikipedia for 'Tolkien languages', 'Middle-earth languages', or any other likely term WILL find this page somewhere within the top five results. That said, the usual convention is to use 'Middle-earth' as the identifier because it is the most widely known and frequently used by all commenters (back to Tolkien himself) to refer to the entire setting in common discussion... despite its technical meaning within the setting being more specific. Ergo, if we must change names I'd suggest 'Elvish languages (Middle-earth)' and 'Languages of Middle-earth'... which I believe this page used to be named until someone else did the whole 'Middle-earth is just the mortal lands' dance and moved it to Arda... which will inevitably happen again some time in the future. --12.42.51.28 (talk) 11:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
The main problem is: Tolkien also constructed several languages outside his fictional world of "Middle-earth". There should be one page where all T's ConLangs could be listed and (briefly) presented. This won't be possible with a page named "Languages of Middle-earth". I also opposed to Elvish languages (Middle-earth). These are ConLangs and it should be im my opinion then Elvish languges (Tolkien). Tolkien made on Elvish tongue for the little "Elfs" in his "Father Xmas" stories for his children. And Elvish languages (Tolkien) cannot be "danced" with. No way of chnaging it (Middle-earth, or Arda). Tolkien is the "maker". Laurifindil (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Tolkien's fictional workd is not "Middle-earth", it is Arda. This is why this article has been kept under this title for years. So far it is the best title I can think of. "Languages constructed by J.R.R. Tolkien" is a possibility, but awkward. "Constructed languages (Tolkien)" doesn't sit right with our article title conventions. --dab (𒁳) 19:08, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Danced? Does that mean you find the phrase awkward, or something else? —Tamfang (talk) 19:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Other than his Middle-earth languages Tolkien is known to have learned the 'Animalic' word substitution cypher created by his cousins, contributed to the 'Nevbosh' sound substitution cypher, and developed the Naffarin language... which could be considered an early draft of 'Elfish / Qenya / Quenya'. That's really only one 'other' constructed language, which is already covered in a few different articles. The Elvish seen in the Father Xmas letters was entirely drawn from Middle-earth... because Tolkien intended Middle-earth to be our Earth.
On the whole 'Arda' bit... well, if we want to get technical, Eru supposedly spoke the word 'Ea' outside of time to bring the universe into existence by naming it so. Ergo, it'd have to be 'Languages of Ea' rather than 'Languages of Arda' to incorporate everything. Unless of course we take communication in the Timeless Halls to be an actual 'language'... then we've got to expand it beyond the bounds of Ea. Or we could just use 'Middle-earth' like Tolkien and every other researcher looking for a good collective term for the setting. --12.42.51.27 (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

forces of change

For example, the leader of the Grey Elves (Elwë Singollo) ardently hatd the house of Fëanor for the Kinslaying of Alqualondë, and forbade their tongue to be spoken in his domain. One may deduce from this that Sindarin may well have changed further over the years due to this. Naturally, Noldorin itself was changed even more as a result of the folly and pride of its speakers.

Is there any support for the last sentence?

Does the middle sentence mean that Sindarin would have changed more after Thingol's decree (why?), or only that Sindarin must have changed markedly before the Noldor returned (else the difference between Sindarin and Exilic Quenya would not be noted)? —Tamfang (talk) 05:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Mannish

The languages of Men of Middle-earth were many, but they were also only alluded to by Tolkien. He developed at least three with a grammar and a vocabulary: Taliska, Adûnaic, and the Soval Pharë, called Westron in English, spoken by Hobbits and Men in the Third Age.

So far as I know, the Adûnaic corpus consists mostly of the names of the later kings, and of Taliska or Westron even less than that. Is there more that I've missed? —Tamfang (talk) 06:31, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Fauskanger has some quotes in Adûnaic but he also writes that there are no coherent texts. However, he lists a number of Westron vocabularies. De728631 (talk) 14:13, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, I forgot about Lowdham (which I haven't thoroughly read). —Tamfang (talk) 18:16, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

"chronological order"

The list of known scripts devised by Tolkien is presented "In chronological order". Which chronology? As the article says (The glossopoeia),

Tolkien's glossopoeia has two temporal dimensions: the internal (fictional) timeline of events described in the Silmarillion and other writings, and the external timeline of Tolkien's own life during which he continually revised and refined his languages and their fictional history.

--Thnidu (talk) 00:57, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

I would guess that the dating of the scripts in Arda's internal history is not well known (nor consistent in external history), so I'd assume the chronology there is external — particularly since at least two of the scripts listed are unrelated to Arda.
(Heh, I thought my phrase "two temporal dimensions" had been taken out, burnt and buried at a crossroads.) —Tamfang (talk) 01:59, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

substitution languages

The paragraph about "translating" Mannish languages with Germanic languages concludes with a sentence that seems to me not to fit:

A natural consequence of this was that these "new" constructed languages had to be worked out by Tolkien in some details.

That's a consequence of using any invented language; if anything, the substitution gimmick reduced the need for such work. —Tamfang (talk) 05:27, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was Merge. Jack Upland (talk) 03:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

I propose that Westron be merged here. The language of Westron was not developed, very few words were invented, and in Tolkien's fiction it is almost always represented by English.--Jack Upland (talk) 09:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merge Rohirric

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was Merge. Jack Upland (talk) 17:14, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

I propose Rohirric be merged here. Rohirric is represented by the Mercian dialect of Anglo-Saxon, and so there isn't much to say about it. The "Etymology" section consists mainly of the translations of names, which is unnecessary trivia.--Jack Upland (talk) 03:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Gnomish" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Gnomish. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 25#Gnomish until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 21:17, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Languages_constructed_by_Tolkien/Archive_1&oldid=1241859139"