Talk:Language and the euro/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about Language and the euro. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Swedish pronounciation
“ | However, many people choose to pronounce it in a more English way [ˈjʊːro] (no "s" in plural). | ” |
Yeah, and I can't help notice that there is a very strong correlation between a person's view on the euro and how she pronounces it. The more opposed she is, the more likely she is to say [ˈjʊːro] rather than [ˈɛvɾu]. I assume it's a way to, consciously or unconsciously, help push the view of the euro as something foreign. The currency exchange firm Forex even forbade (and still does?) its personnel to use any other pronounciation than [ˈjʊːro]. (Source: [1])
I would like to remove that pronounciation from the summary table. It might be used in practice, but it is not a correct Swedish pronounciation, linguistically or officially. I have no problem with letting the above sentence remain in the text though. --Maggu (talk) 09:39, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- How do you know what's correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 20:35, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, folks, the correct English spelling is 'pronunciation', not 'pronounciation'!213.127.210.95 (talk) 15:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Spelling of "spelt"
A minor point: the article uses both forms of the past participle of "spell". Should we standardize on one spelling. I think "spelt" is preferred in British English. --Boson (talk) 07:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've amended the article to say "spelt" McLerristarr (talk) 03:24, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
The true situation is that "spelled" (like similar spellings, as well as "organize" and so on) is acceptable in both British and American English, but "spelt" (and "organise") only in British English.213.127.210.95 (talk) 15:54, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Linguistic issues concerning the euro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060226031106/http://www.asturies.com:80/paxina.php?fpaxina=bilordios0218 to http://www.asturies.com/paxina.php?fpaxina=bilordios0218
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)