Talk:Langley Academy, Slough

Berkshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Berkshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Berkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BerkshireWikipedia:WikiProject BerkshireTemplate:WikiProject BerkshireBerkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education in the United Kingdom (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education in the United Kingdom, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Education in the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Education in the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Education in the United KingdomEducation in the United Kingdom articles

Untitled

Is it correct to list Langleywood as a comprehensive school? My understanding is that Slough has a selective system so presumably the non Grammar schools remain secondary moderns or maybe High schools?: Grblundell 18:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article says its a former secondary modern so I presumed it was a comprehensive school. I'm not familiar with the process in Slough but feel free to change the category if you think it appropriate. I don't think it should be categorised as a high school, as that is generally an American term, but I'm not sure what else to call it. Perhaps someone associated with the school can advise Dahliarose 19:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

just checked the Ofsted article. They reckon it's a comprehensive. So you are right, and I am wrong. We live and learn - sorry for questioning your work unnecessarily! Grblundell 16:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]