Talk:Landmark Aviation

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

New Company Name

Garrett Aviation-->Landmark Aviation-->StandardAero. Garrett Aviation became Landmark Aviation after a 2004 merger, and was renamed as StandardAero after a further merger in 2007. See "Dubai Aerospace Buys Standard Aero, Landmark for $1.9B," Defense Industry Daily, August 2, 2007. So the current article should probably be renamed from Landmark Aviation to StandardAero. The company ownership remains Dubai Aerospace Enterprise.--Mack2 (talk) 04:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then what is this company? http://www.landmarkaviation.com/ Apparently not all of Landmark became StandardAero, remaing as an airport services business. Looks like some more sources and research are needed here before making any drastic changes. - BillCJ (talk) 09:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Damn good question, Bill. Maybe a related one is whether there should be an article for StandardAero as well as Landmark. Possibly this is the Landmark that existed (and still exists) prior to Garrett Aviation being merged with it, and now that they've removed the old Garrett (and put into the "new" StandardAero, as they promote it) it's back to it's old stuff. But Landmark isn't what it used to be. Hmmm. Does need more research.--Mack2 (talk) 15:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is conflicting information in the article (it seems as though it was put there by someone who is associated with the company). I am too tired to sign in, I am User:Teamcoltra 66.82.9.61 (talk) 07:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Landmark Aviation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081223140823/http://www.landmarkaviation.com/news_events/press_releases/2008/2008_0303_encore.shtm to http://www.landmarkaviation.com/news_events/press_releases/2008/2008_0303_encore.shtm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:11, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]