Talk:Land of Black Gold/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 05:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

I will review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments

• "It then began serialisation in France in the magazine Coeurs Vaillants-Ames Vaillants from 4 August 1940, but after an interruption continued in Message Aux Couers Caillants in June 1945." — Doesn't make sense.
  • I've changed this to the following: "After being published in Belgium, the story began serialisation in neighbouring France; initially appearing in the magazine Coeurs Vaillants-Âmes Vaillants from 4 August 1940, the story was ultimately interrupted, and would only recommence in June 1945, this time in the magazine Message Aux Couers Caillants." Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:43, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
• wikilink "eczema".
  • Done! Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
• "worklaod" — typo.
  • That's weird; I thought that I'd already corrected that one. No matter - I've corrected it now! Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
• Assouline's review can be added in the "Critical Analysis" section as well.
  • Looking through Assouline's biography, he really offers very little in the way of critical commentary on Land of Black Gold but I have included what I can; a brief comment on the inclusion of Haddock into the adventure. Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

@Midnightblueowl: That's all from me. Another great read, Midnightblueowl. Address the comments whilst providing explanations and the article is passed. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 08:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.

   Pass or Fail:

@Midnightblueowl: Congratulations! The article is passed. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 17:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Ssven2! Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC)