Talk:Lancefield, Victoria

Australia: Places / Victoria Low‑importance

	Australia portal Lancefield, Victoria is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Rebecca C. Lancefield

I don't know how to do this, so I'm asking anyone who can: please remove the redirect for Lancefield! When I searched for the scientist Rebecca Landsfield this page was the only one Wikipedia's search function found, which is unfortunate because it suggests that an entry on this important microbiologist does not exist in Wikipedia. Someone else might have given up and left with this impression, instead of trying to modify their search, which is what I ended up doing. 85.178.28.248 (talk) 07:05, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have added a hatnote pointing to Rebecca Lancefield at the top of the article. I trust this is suitable. Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 08:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Railway section

I propose that the content under the Railway section be moved to a new article,

and replaced by a shorter summary of the information. With this in mind I am currently working on an article at User:Scottius11/Lancefield railway line, Victoria. Comments and criticism appreciated. Scottius11 (talk) 06:09, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved content to a new article as proposed above. Scottius11 (talk) 01:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]