Talk:Lamborghini Silhouette

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I think it might make sense to have one article called Lamborghini V8 cars that would include the content of Lamborghini V8, Lamborghini Urraco, this article, and Lamborghini Jalpa. There is not much in each individual article and much of what is there is repeated in the other articles. Do you think this would be a good idea? Respectfully, SamBlob 12:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My personal opinion is to keep individual pages for each car, since they were individual models. Whilst they do have similarities, they were separate cars. I agree though that the articles are are skimpy and would benefit from more content. There's got to be somebody who knows more about these cars that can give more history on them. --Notorious Biggles 12:38, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to submit a vote for 'one article per model' with supporting arguments adduced when I noticed that Notorious Biggles had already entered all my strongest arguments. So ... I agree with NB. Outside of these Lamborghinis, if you SOMETIMES have one page for several models and sometimes give individual models their own page, then people don't know what to look for. And in terms of computer admin logic (and given the extent to which Wiki articles depend on links) "one to one" relationships are always (at last in my experience) light years more administratively manageable than "one to many" relationships and / or (not quite) random combinations of "1:1"s and "I:>1"s. Given the desirability of making the articles more beefy, has anyone armed with the appropriate language knowledge attempted to check and where appropirate translate chunks from the German and / or Italian language articles, if any exist for the affected models (and I'm pretty sure that the Uracco, at least, gets already a bit of a write-up in German, and there may, as far as I can tell, also be a brief expose of a complementary view in the Dutch entry)? Charles01 13:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These models are all unique and deserve separate pages, the management issues above only seal the deal. --scottst ??:??, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

File:Lamborghini silhouette.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Lamborghini silhouette.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Lamborghini silhouette.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:36, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lamborghini Silhouette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100107131615/http://www.lamborghini.com/2006/lamboSitenormal.asp?lang=eng to http://www.lamborghini.com/2006/lamboSitenormal.asp?lang=eng

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]