Talk:Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 23:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Well written, in accordance with MoS for science articles. Although I have limited knowledge of medicine and biochemistry, I could follow the article.
- IVIG (end of treatment section)needed explanation, I added a wikilink and the acronym.[2] I also consolidated some stray sentences.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- References appear fine, RS, no OR. I assume good faith for sources which I cannot access.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Appears to cover the subject well.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Captioned and tagged correctly
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- OK, this is good to go. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 23:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: