Jump to content

Talk:Lalji Singh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLalji Singh has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowIn the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 22, 2015Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 13, 2015.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Lalji Singh (pictured) is popularly known as the "Father of DNA Fingerprinting" in India?
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on December 11, 2017.
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 10, 2023.

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lalji Singh/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AmaryllisGardener (talk · contribs) 16:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Notes

[edit]

I made some improvements to the article, but some things still need tending to:

  • "These findings later became the foundation for the discovery of a similar phenomenon of sex reversal in human." needs a ref.
  • All of the things listed in "Awards and Honors" that don't have refs need them. Nevermind
  • While not required, a little more copyediting would be great.

--AmaryllisGardener talk 17:07, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming w.carter is done copyediting, I've decided to promote this article to GA. --AmaryllisGardener talk 01:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Recent format editing by a user

[edit]

Dear @W.carter:, I noticed that a user had done lots of citation format editing on Lalji Singh. We had discussed the citation format in length and these were also checked by other senior editors, reviewed in GA too. Are the changes made by the user @Skr15081997: appropriate?? If not, {{u|Skr15081997)) should explain, why he did it being an experienced user and I request him to undo them in that case. Views? Educationtemple (talk) 14:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Times of India is a newspaper and should be used in the |work= parameter instead of |publisher. Publisher for The Times of India is The Times Group.

References

  1. ^ "Nailing a criminal the DNA way". http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com. Retrieved 3 March 2015. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help); More than one of |work= and |website= specified (help)

--Skr15081997 (talk) 14:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The work vs publisher mentioned above is totally ok, but please do not remove all the |website= | and preferably save between edits so that not the whole thing has to be reverted. Some of the changes were perfectly ok. w.carter-Talk 14:21, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @W.carter: for the advise and revert. Thanks to @Skr15081997: too for "good edits" (that you could please go ahead and do by saving them in between, as per the discussion above. Cheers! Educationtemple (talk) 14:24, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't removed all of the |website=. Please check the edit carefully. Thanks.--Skr15081997 (talk) 14:28, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Educationtemple: If you are so much concerned about linkrot then you should use |archiveurl= and |archivedate=. Use https://archive.org/web/ to track archived versions of the cited url. Providing a bare url in the |website= field isn't an aesthetic solution to the problem. I still can't understand why my edit was reverted.--Skr15081997 (talk) 14:43, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved

I acted too soon and have apologized to the injured party. w.carter-Talk 14:55, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers my friends! I too thanked @Skr15081997: for his original edits. Let me learn something here, I am trying to understand archive.org, how it functions! Cheers! Educationtemple (talk) 15:02, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lalji Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lalji Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lalji_Singh&oldid=1205386045"