Jump to content

Talk:Lake Strom Thurmond

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Citations

[edit]

Many/ all of the facts listed are without citation. Also, much is opinionated and without verification.68.47.19.11 23:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who would people with first hand knowledge cite? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.127.94.7 (talk) 15:54, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Largest Lake?

[edit]

I disagree with the statment "At 71,000 acres (287 km²), it is the 2nd largest artificial lake east of the Mississippi River.(The largest is the Kentucky Lake.)" While Kentucky Lake is the largest, Lake Strom Thurmond is 3rd behind Lake Marion which has a surface area of 110,000 acres. I use this is my external reference, http://www.sciway.net/city/lake-marion-sc.html . Rocketmaniac 16:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very Biased article

[edit]

This article reads like a chamber of commerce advert. It talks about none of the negative impacts of the dam. (fish population decreases, coastal outflow to the sea being sharply reduced with negative impacts to marine ecosystems, hundreds of people displaced by the dam's building, Silt buildup behind the dam, etc.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.200.217.58 (talk) 05:03, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Strom ThurmondClarks Hill Lake

  • A summary of name usage:
    1. South Carolina: Lake Strom Thurmond
    2. Georgia: Clarks Hill Lake
    3. US Central Government: Lake Strom Thurmond
    4. (¡Unsourced!) more common name according to the article: Clarks Hill Lake
  • Without more evidence, hardly a compelling case for a move. —  AjaxSmack  13:28, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lake Strom Thurmond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]