Jump to content

Talk:Lake Street station (Arlington, Massachusetts)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 18:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio check

[edit]

Earwig says good to go.

Files

[edit]
  • File:Lake Street station, circa 1915.jpg: good, valid public domain rationale—published prior to 1928;
  • File:Floral display at Lake Street station, 1905.jpg: good, valid public domain rationale per above;
  • File:Former site of Lake Street station (1), September 2022.jpg: good, CC-BY-SA 4.0, uploaded to Commons by nom (thanks!).

Prose

[edit]
  • "In 1876, town officials" – nitpicking, but do the sources say what role these town officials had? The word choice is fairly vague.
    •  Done Clarified.
  • "the B&M held contests among its station agents to create floral displays at its station." – was this at the station or in the station? Additionally, were these displays intended for the station or does the source not say? Also;
  • "[…] create floral displays at its station." – recommend "[…] create floral displays at the station." to avoid repeating the previous its station earlier in the same sentence.
    •  Done Reworded in a way that should fix both points.
  • "In 1926–27" – recommend "Between 1926 and 1927".
    • I tend to reserve "between" for ranges; construction took place in 1926 and 1927.
      • Noted!
  • "the only surviving stations of the Lexington Branch are Bedford and Lexington" – sentence is missing a period.
    •  Done

Refs

[edit]

Spotchecks on refs 1, 2, 7, 15, 19 and 21 show no concerns—they all support the article's content. I had access to confirm ref 21 via a preview on Google Books.

  • Ref 2 is missing a publication date.
    • This document is an odd one - it's updated a few times a year, hence why I don't have the date in the template. I can add an accessdate if really necessary, but I don't personally think it's needed.
      • Ah, I see. Well, for cite web templates dates are not required so I doubt they are needed in this case either.

Other

[edit]

Templates (including infobox and coords), external links and cats good.

Thanks for the WP:ALT text!

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.