Talk:Lake Padden

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lakes

	Lakes portal Lake Padden is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

thanks Docu for helping. CallMeAndrew (talk) 15:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tone concerns

I've tagged the article as having tone issues as I think it is written in quite a promotional/ travel guide-ish manner, not the formal, business like tone described in Wikipedia:Writing better articles#Tone. Guest9999 (talk) 01:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

did u do that edit and put in the reference thing? thanks. plus u kinda talk too intelligent. its hard to understand. but i try. CallMeAndrew (talk) 02:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrote the article to reflect a more professional tone. There are still vague statements using terms such as popular but I will try to find articles or official documentation to support them. Lonelymiesarchie (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First two sentences don't mesh...

First sentence identifies it as a lake, than second sentence refers to a park. I am aware that the lake is within a park, but others might not and thusly be comfused. A seperate entire entry might be warrented for info about the park itself, as this entry is titled specific to the lake. Short of that it would probably be worth mentioning that the lake is stocked for fishing, and that motorized boats are not allowed. Some more statics about the lake would be nice, if they are available, otherwise perhaps shifting this information to an article about the entire park which includes info about the lake would be better, as there is very little information regarding the lake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GusgusMadrona (talk • contribs) 04:38, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]