Talk:Lake Kariba

Lake Kariba was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 23, 2005	Good article nominee	Listed
September 18, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Lakes High‑importance

	Lakes portal Lake Kariba is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Zambia / Zimbabwe

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Zambia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Zambia (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Zimbabwe (assessed as High-importance).

Comments

I have noticed that some of the facts and figures differ from source to source. Does anyone have a solution for this? The figures in the Infobox were collected from the article itself and from the World Lakes Database, with preference given generally to the World lakes Database because it has proven to be a fairly reliable source. If you dispute these figures, or any other portion of the article, please be welcome to update the details; but remember to cite references where appropriate :D Em3rald 17:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if WLD is the ideal reference. -- User:Docu

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Lake Kariba/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of September 18, 2008, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

This article does not meet the broadness GA criterion, 3a. We're told that it's "one of the world's largest man-made reservoirs", but we're told nothing about its construction.

Where were the local Tonga people moved to?

The last three sections – Ecology, Protected Areas, and In popular culture – are entirely uncited.

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 20:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some observations on this:
- The 'where' of the relocation is addressed in the second paragraph.
- While the construction of such a large project might be included -- and I hope that someone will do so -- I don't think is required to meet the GA designation. I haven't encountered problems with that designation before so am not certain. Could you do some advising here on the discussion page?
- Ecology needs more references. I think that the section on protected areas is fine, although a map would be helpful. In Popular Culture needs citations, especially and most importantly re ownership of a resort.
- I haven't checked the references yet; some of this may already be covered there.
- Not, perhaps, a fully satisfying GA because of the lack of citations but but very close. I hope that more is done with it.
- I don't check for changes on Wikipedia as often as I should, and certainly not my own talk page, but will look for your assistance here.

--Kovar (talk) 02:58, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lake Kariba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

=