Jump to content

Talk:Lake Cahuilla/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Codyorb (talk · contribs) 17:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commencing GA review for Lake Cahuilla. I'll read through the article and begin reviewing later today. Codyorb (talk) 17:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

REVIEW: Sorry for the delay! Here's the review:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Article is somewhat long, although it's very readable and informative.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    All facts verified with citations
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Images are licensed for usage
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Passes. Great work on a great article!