Talk:Laid Back (album)

Laid Back (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 18, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Laid Back (album) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 February 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Gregg Allman's album Laid Back was titled as an inside reference to a studio term that Allman coined for when a song needed to be more relaxed?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Laid Back (album).

Wikipedia

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reference Problem

I could not find any references maybe you can if you do just remove my reference notice --Mactrac (talk) 01:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The references are in the reviews listed in the infobox. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i see them now, sorry about that Mactrac (talk) 18:28, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Laid Back (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Retrohead (talk · contribs) 15:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The review

There's a "citation needed" tag about the recording date (in the lead and infobox).
The 'Composition' section seems not fully researched. Do we have information about the other tracks?
There's a minor miss in the certifications. Per RIAA, gold equals half a million copies shipped.
Apart from the notes above, the rest of the article seems fine. I'll put this on hold.

Hey thanks for the review. I've added a reference for its release date. I'd hoped for the composition section to be fulfilled over time (as a poorly-remembered album, there isn't THAT much info on its tracks, nor will there likely be), so I've reincorporated it into the recording section. The RIAA thing was my bad; I'd thought that gold, prior to 1975 or so, represented 1 million sales but I was mistaken. Alright, let me know if there's any more to be done. Thanks again. Saginaw-hitchhiker (talk) 05:12, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead info not expanded upon

This information from the lead, "The album explores Allman's varying influences, including rhythm and blues and soul music. It consists of several cover songs, originals, and a traditional hymn", I was sad to not see mentioned again in the main body of the article. Not knowing what the source for this information is, shouldn't it really be expanded upon in the body to justify it being in the lead?--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 11:07, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]