Talk:Laguna Fire (1993)

Laguna Fire (1993) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 6, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Wildfire

	Laguna Fire (1993) is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.WildfireWikipedia:WikiProject WildfireTemplate:WikiProject WildfireWildfire
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Passed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:33, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Laguna Fire (1993)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Looking good with copy changes made. Will pass. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:31, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes

its flames were routinely 40–50 feet (12–15 m) in height, but occasionally reached 200 feet (61 m) into the air Unnecessary comma (WP:CINS)

Done - sentence rephrased slightly in such a way as to remove the comma Penitentes (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But as the wind shifted Remove the "But" to start the sentence

Done - removed

bulldozers constructed firebreaks on the fire's north side between the community of Turtle Rock and Laguna Canyon Road and firefighters continued with firing operations. Add a comma after "Road" (CINS)

Done - removed

A$50,000 reward missing space

Done - space added

A Los Angeles Times investigation Italicize the name of the newspaper

Done - italicized, wikilinked

limiting factor during the fire, instead, it had been the distribution system The comma after "fire" should be a semicolon.

Done - switched

In other areas, as homes burned the pipes inside them broke Make reading a little easier by adding a comma after "burned"

Done - added

Sourcing and spot checks

The article cites the firestorm report 24 times.

It's an invaluable reference for the article but perhaps I use it as a crutch too much. I'll start combing through to see if more statements solely sourced to it can be attributed to secondary sources. Penitentes (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Penitentes I got busy but this was actually going to be for spot checks specific to that report. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2i: No issues. Y
2n: Firing out to protect Newport Beach. Y
2s: Declaration of control on Oct. 28 6pm. Y

5: flames were spotted in the vicinity of the Laguna Coast Wilderness Park off Laguna Canyon Road Y
7: Amide [sic] a wholesale evacuation... Y
19: Orange County fire officials, who had stopped actively investigating the case about three months ago and reopened it only when Martinez confessed to starting the blaze, said Wednesday they were also disappointed. Y
23: 2001 list shows Laguna at seventh. One of the listed fires above is after: Jones (1999). Y

Images

All three images come from Orange County Archives which offered them as cc-by-2.0. No concerns here. Alt text present.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.