Talk:Lafayette Bridge

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lafayette Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100830145454/http://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/hwy52-stpaul/index.html to http://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/hwy52-stpaul/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replacement bridge is finished

It took five years and I think they did it in pieces, but it looks like the bridge was replaced.

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2015/11/10/lafayette-bridge-construction-over

I don't know enough of the details to make the necessary edits myself. There's a lot of text written after the I-35W bridge collapse and before reconstruction that is out of date. I believe it's a new bridge now. DavidRF (talk) 17:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and take this bridge to work nearly daily (it's long been complete). I came to find a history of the construction, which isn't provided due to the present-tense language. In addition, it overshot the original timeline greatly. I found some helpful information on the wayback machine if that's helpful:

Oldest project page for the bridge they have, which states it did start in Jan 2011. It also was originally targeting 2011-2012 for northbound, then 2013-2014 for southbound: https://web.archive.org/web/20110518040829/http://www.dot.state.mn.us/lafayettebridge

2016-03-10 is the last archived project page listing it as "current": https://web.archive.org/web/20160310170736/http://www.dot.state.mn.us:80/lafayettebridge/

2016-04-10 is the first archived project page listing it as "complete": https://web.archive.org/web/20160413024342/http://www.dot.state.mn.us/lafayettebridge/

If useful, there is a more detailed list of updates here that could be scanned through in time: https://web.archive.org/web/20110927053931/http://www.dot.state.mn.us/lafayettebridge/projectupdate.html

I agree that the current language/flow is not great.

Jwhendy (talk) 13:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]