Talk:Lady Margaret Seymour

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Women's History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Talk: Margaret Seymour (writer) I've been unable to confirm this person's existence. Is Mary Seymour meant? The Wikipedia page for Edward Seymour, 1st Duke of Somerset - to which this page links - does not mention any of his children (at time of writing). Edward Seymour's wife Anne Seymour (née Stanhope - see Wikipedia entry for Anne Seymour, Duchess of Somerset) does lists their children: Margaret is not mentioned, though both Anne Seymour 1540-1588 and Jane Seymour "b.1541" are given - and the Wiki pages for both these women also link to "Margaret Seymour". The Peerage.com (here: http://www.thepeerage.com/p10304.htm#i103035) identifies three daughters to Edward Seymour by Anne Stanhope: "Anne Seymour d. 1588, Mary Seymour, Elizabeth Seymour d. 3 Jun 1602" - no Margaret ... and no Jane! (Their mistake - Jane Seymour definitely did exist.) Tudor place identifies no less than six daughters including a Margaret, but gives no further information about her. (Here: http://www.tudorplace.com.ar/SEYMOUR.htm#Edward%20SEYMOUR%20(1°%20D.%20Somerset) The only evidence I've been able to find on the net for Anne, Jane and "Margaret" as writers is in references to their joint authorship of "the first formal and original Latin verse encomium by a female author to be printed in England." Example links: http://www.scholarsbookshelf.com/item.asp?userid=&newbooks=0&bargain=0&method=subnav&pageid=5&catid=7&itemid=44340 http://www.jstor.org/pss/4174542 http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6MEd4AA_S8UC&pg=PA258&lpg=PA258&dq=Anne++Margaret+Jane+Seymour+verse+encomium&source=bl&ots=JzWObzn5V7&sig=tS5VdBWHeNMZIgtQ_l0YdJFe1EU&hl=en&ei=xm7LSdDUOJipsAaMpb27CA&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=5&ct=result One Latin poem seems a very slender thread to support the claim that she was "an influential writer" - not least as she may not even have existed. Does anyone have any more evidence for her?--83.254.87.111 (talk) 12:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]