Talk:Lady Angela Forbes

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sitwell (mis)quotation

The Sitwell quotation is given without much context.

It seems to come from her autobiography, Taken Care Of (first published in 1965, shortly after the author's death; republished in 2011), where Sitwell is writing about Forbes's unkempt appearance: those paragraphs also mention "an impression of tattered hairiness"; and then, in answer to a perceived insult by Forbes of her brother Sacheverell Sitwell, Edith waspishly adds that "all the young males of her acquaintance referred to her, invariably, by words of one syllable - one Biblical, the other veterinary". Nice work, Edith. Classy.

It is followed by a back-handed compliment, calling Forbes the "epitome of the Edwardian reign", although earlier she is "a bad hang-over from the Edwardian era"; an "obstructionist" whose behaviour made it difficult to protect her good name. In context, this seems to be a bad thing, but in modern terms you might say Forbes would not conform to society's strict rules for women of her class and gender.

Have these undercurrents been explored in the literature anywhere? 213.205.240.161 (talk) 08:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As is clear from the link above, and reviews of the 1965 publication, Leslie misquotes the original, which says Forbes is "an elderly gorilla afflicted with sex-appeal" - that is, "afflicted" not "affected" and hyphenated "sex-appeal". 213.205.240.161 (talk) 11:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected the quote in the article, based on Google books online version of Sitwell's autobiography, and Huon corrected the quote (of the misquote) that was on wp Main Page in DYK. I think major surgery to the article should wait, however, until it is no longer linked from the main page. HouseOfChange (talk) 12:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Lady Angela Forbes, by Dorothy Wilding (1921).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]