Talk:Lacuna model
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This looks to be an interesting topic...
[edit]... but the article needs more work. It has no reference list, and needs editing for style. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 00:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. I have no earthly idea what this article is talking about. 75.34.18.14 (talk) 21:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
I am not an expert in this area but find the recency of the citations in this article suspicious. The lacuna model was a common currency when I was studying literary theory in US in 1984. Would have expected citations or mentions of perhaps Derrida,Barthes, Baudrillard, Irigaray etc.82.35.244.11 (talk) 06:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
From a theoretical perspective, this description of "Lacuna Model" is grossly uninformative. I was unable to locate any meaningful articles from the citations and I found no justification that such a model exists in anything outside of this page. In other contexts, "Lacuna" refers to a specific gap (missing context) in a text, language, or social construct. The citations from this article (which are circumspect) would be better noted in respective definitions of the noun, rather than inventing a model that does no real justice to the word. 74.109.218.202 (talk) 03:41, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Broken link
[edit]I removed the following from the article because the link is broken.
The containing web site does not appear to contain any reference to Lacuna Model. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tenbergen (talk • contribs) 05:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)