Talk:Lactate shuttle hypothesis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lactate shuttle hypothesis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 19 April 2013 by reviewer Arthur goes shopping (talk · contribs).

In critical illness

doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70154-2 discusses the lactate shuttle paradigm in stress hyperlactatemia, including empirical evidence that the anaerobic metabolism theory doesn't hold and that much of hyperlactataemia seen in clinical practice is related to catecholamine-induced glycolysis. JFW | T@lk 15:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peroxisome

At the end of this section, it says see figure. Figure is absent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.149.237.104 (talk) 16:40, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]