Talk:Lactarius subflammeus
Appearance
Lactarius subflammeus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 20, 2010. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:Lactarius subflammeus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ucucha 19:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- No work on the phylogenetic relations of this species?
- Not that I'm aware of. There hasn't been much published about this mushroom. Sasata (talk) 20:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- That at least I had understood. :-) Ucucha 20:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- The lead has a few details that are not in the body (that it is slimy when fresh and that it is especially common in California and the Pacific Northwest). Sasata (talk) 20:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- I think I've fixed this. Thanks for another review! Sasata (talk) 20:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Ucucha 19:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks; I'll pass the article now. Ucucha 20:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)