Talk:Lactarius salmonicolor
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
@Boothsift: I really don't think this can be classified as a stub. It is definitely start class. BluePankow ✉ 01:43, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- @BluePankow: It's a pretty short article. --BoothSift 01:44, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Boothsift: Yes, but I think it holds relatively enough information to be considered beyond what an average person would desire to know. The definition on the stub page is: "A stub is an article that, although providing some useful information, is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, and that is capable of expansion." Yes, it's capable of expansion, but it is also absolutely long enough and in depth enough to provide encyclopedic coverage of this species. BluePankow ✉ 01:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC) Also, I think it's fair to say that any article up to GA is also capable of expansion, so why not name it that? BluePankow ✉ 01:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- @BluePankow: No, I will not call it a good article, C-class, or B-class. Your article is very short, you just have a lot of images that make it seem larger.--BoothSift 04:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Boothsift: Yes, but I think it holds relatively enough information to be considered beyond what an average person would desire to know. The definition on the stub page is: "A stub is an article that, although providing some useful information, is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, and that is capable of expansion." Yes, it's capable of expansion, but it is also absolutely long enough and in depth enough to provide encyclopedic coverage of this species. BluePankow ✉ 01:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC) Also, I think it's fair to say that any article up to GA is also capable of expansion, so why not name it that? BluePankow ✉ 01:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- @BluePankow: It's a pretty short article. --BoothSift 01:44, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- I would certainly consider this start-class. It has a reasonably detailed description of the species. Habitat and distribution are mentioned (though that could be expanded). Human use is covered. Plantdrew (talk) 20:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Boothsift: @Plantdrew: I’m sorry, I wasn’t intending to refer to my article as anything above start class, I should have been more specific. Thank you for the consideration Plant Drew. I’d like to revert it to start. BluePankow ✉ 21:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- I already put it back to start class when I edited this talk page to make my comment above. Plantdrew (talk) 21:33, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Plantdrew: Sorry, didn’t see the template because I was replying from my phone. Thank you! BluePankow ✉ 22:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
L. thyinos synonym
[edit]@Loopy30: I was wondering if you could provide the source saying explicitly that these species are synonymous. My search only turned up sources saying they were very similar. UpdateNerd (talk) 07:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- additional synonyms and reference added. Loopy30 (talk) 13:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)