Talk:Lactarius fallax/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will start ASAP! Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Short and sweet:

In Taxonomy; the segment "The publication also described the variety Lactarius fallax var. concolor based on specimens collected in Mount Hood. According to Smith and Hesler, this variety had been to that point generally identified as Lactarius lignyotus in the Pacific Northwest." Can we elaborate on how the delineation was made from L. lignyotus to L. fallax var. concolor? Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added a few more details about this. Sasata (talk) 15:46, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'Tis another wrap! Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:05, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! Sasata (talk) 04:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Lactarius fallax passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass