Talk:Lactarius alnicola
Lactarius alnicola has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 20, 2010. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:Lactarius alnicola/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ucucha 18:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Can you make the etymology a little more explicit? (I.e., say that Alnus = alder and cola = inhabitant).
- Done. Sasata (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- "Cap martin (edge of the cap)"—is the gloss necessary?
- Probably not, but I was asked to gloss it once before, and have been glossing ever since. I'll try unglossing for this one and see what happens. Sasata (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- "with matted fibrils beneath the gluten near the margin"—please explain
- Done. Sasata (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- "central and Californian population"—don't you mean "central Californian"?
- central and southern, fixed. Sasata (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- "slowly stains pale yellow"—when? Does it become yellow in maturity or when you do something to the fungus?
- CLarified. Sasata (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- "nominate subspecies"—wouldn't that be the nominate variety?
- Yup. Sasata (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- So how can we distinguish it from Catharellus cibarius?
- Added. Sasata (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Baja California is not in the United States (I corrected this).
- My last geography class was in grade 8. It's obvious sometimes. Sasata (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Should the lead mention that it may also form associations with non-conifers, like oaks and alders?
- Done. Sasata (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- India is a big place, so I think you should mention the state. Are there no data on ecological associations there?
- Added state, no other data at this time. Sasata (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Is this useful: Title: Russulaceous ectomycorrhizae of Abies lasiocarpa and Picea engelmannii Author(s): Kernaghan, G; Currah, RS; Bayer, RJ Source: CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE Volume: 75 Issue: 11 Pages: 1843-1850 Published: NOV 1997
Title: Additional new records on Lactarius from Mexico Author(s): Montoya, L; Bandala, VM Source: MYCOTAXON Volume: 57 Pages: 425-450 Published: JAN-MAR 1996
- Both useful and added. Sasata (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Ucucha 18:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the excellent comments and quick review! Sasata (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks; I'm now passing the article. Ucucha 06:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lactarius alnicola. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101107084059/http://www.mykoweb.com/CAF/species/Cantharellus_cibarius.html to http://www.mykoweb.com/CAF/species/Cantharellus_cibarius.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)