Talk:Lachancea kluyveri

Fungi Mid‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Classification

S. kluyverii has been reclassified as Lachancea kluyverii, see: DOI: 10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00175-2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.198.71.141 (talk) 23:17, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Strong consensus including input from the relevant WikiProject, no need to wait until a second discussion period expires. Andrewa (talk) 10:25, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Saccharomyces kluyveri → Lachancea kluyveri – This organism was formerly classified as belonging to the Saccharomyces genus. However, after more detailed analysis of phylogenetic data, it became clear that it is more appropriate to place it in the genus Lachancea. The research article accessible at doi:10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00175-2 explains the details of this analysis. The website of the Genolevures consortium at http://genolevures.org/sakl.html also notes this reclassification. The page should be renamed to "Lachancea kluyveri", with "Saccharomyces kluyveri" redirecting there. --Relisted. Andrewa (talk) 15:15, 17 November 2014 (UTC) 146.6.213.10 (talk) 00:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: A borderline one to close as move but I cannot make any sense of the refs supplied by nom, I suspect purely because I'm not knowledgeable in the area, so I've posted a heads-up at the relevant WikiProject. [1] Andrewa (talk) 15:22, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Uncontroversial move. Both Index Fungorum and MycoBank give Lachancea kluyveri as the current name for this species. Sasata (talk) 20:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Exactly the advice I was after, thank you! Andrewa (talk) 08:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I also concur with the move. Medmyco (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.