This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
@IanDBeacon: Please discuss your reasoning for reverting the IPs edits. Also, make sure to try and be respectful when reverting next time (obviously the IP was way more disrespectful but telling the user to "go away" is still disrespectful). The IPs edits seemed perfectly fine as they were reference appropriately. Also, next time, if you revert the IPs edit and they revert it back, instead of reverting again, start a discussion on the talk page so it doesn't turn into an edit war. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 18:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Upon further inspection it appears you were reverting the edits because the user is a suspected sock of another user. However, you didn't necessarily provide any evidence of the IP being a sock (i.e a link to an investigation at WP:SPI). While I"m not saying you were completely in the wrong, I would still like an explanation as to what went on before this with the user wh you are claiming the IP is a sock of. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 18:44, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah that helps explain things. Thanks for providing me with some context! Seems like a case of people who think they're right and everyone else is wrong no matter what. Regardless, even though they hurl expletive (i think that's the right word and spelling) comments at you, you should still try and remain calm and be as nice as you can. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 19:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
So what? It may have been founded by the same person, but this is an article about the studio, not the founder. Lacewood is not Amberwood. If Amberwood is notable then write an article about it. Meters (talk) 03:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All we have is an unsourced claim that most of the assets of Lacewood were obtained by Amberwood, but even the source above (1998) does not mention this. Meters (talk) 03:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.