This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Talk:Laccolith is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
I merged the existing references into a reflist because I wasn't sure how to go about citing the same source twice without one (other than ending up with two identical sources with two numerical citation indicators in the body of the text, which didn't seem preferable to a reflist), but in the course of cleaning up and reading what to do with the references not cited in the text, I found text in the help indicating one shouldn't convert normal references to a reflist without consensus. Being that this is a small article, I figured I would just go ahead and do it, but if someone wants to further clean up the reflist, feel free -- in fact, I'm not even sure whether I should have cited my source twice, or just once at the end of the paraphrased material. Thanks. Mr0t1633 (talk) 19:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
