Talk:Lac des Neiges

Canada: Quebec / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tone is a bit too promotional/puffery, possible original research

Reading this version as of a few minutes ago makes me think I'm reading a travel guide. Portions are way too promotional for Wikipedia's standards. For example, phrases like This exceptional forest ecosystem has not been seriously affected by severe natural disturbances (fires, insect epidemics and high winds); which is exceptional for such an old coniferous forest and the following sentences can be re-written to something like This old growth forest has not been seriously affected by natural disasters[citation goes here]. If there is no reliable source making that claim, then don't say it at all.

Also, avoid drawing conclusions like The forests... are unlikely to evolve... or The glacial deposits are important..., that is considered "original research" which Wikipedia does not allow, see Wikipedia:No original research. If a reliable, independent source makes such a claim, you can put it here, but include a citation. Otherwise, leave it out. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 14:59, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This has been mostly fixed. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre-Michel Laure

There is a stub article on the French Wikipedia for fr:Pierre-Michel Laure. Creating an article about him would "get the red out" of the redlink to his future article.

However, if he does not meet the notability guidelines for the ENGLISH Wikipedia, do not create the article, just de-wikilink it. Makers of notable maps are not necessarily notable. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]