Talk:Labatt Brewing Company/Archive 1

Archive 1

Ownership

I believe that following standard business usage it would be more appropriate to write the first lines as 'Labatt is a Canadian brewery.' and 'It was purchased by InBev.' or words to that effect. It has to do with corporate politics. --McDogm 14:44, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

Sounds good; done. —Sean κ. + 18:07, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

The claim that Blue was the top-selling beer brand in Canada until 2004 is untrue. For most of the eighties and nineties, Molson Canadian was the top-selling brand. See: http://www.cassies.ca/caselibrary/winners/MolsonsCase.pdf "Canadian established itself as the number one beer in Canada in the mid–80s, and solidified its lead in 1994 with 'I am Canadian.' In recent years, however, Labatt's regained momentum with 'Out of the Blue,' while Molson stumbled creatively."

I'm changing the claim to indicate that it was "one of the top 2" beer brands until 2004. I think it's generally believed to be number 4 now.Pageblank 23:57, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Labatt Blue.jpg

Image:Labatt Blue.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Londonflag.PNG

Image:Londonflag.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Londonflag.PNG

Image:Londonflag.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Londonflag.PNG

Image:Londonflag.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Year of Acquisition by InBev

This article currently says that Labatt was acquired by InBev in 1991, which is incorrect. The acquisition took place in 1995. See this page from the official Labatt web site: http://www.labatt.ca/english/lbc_company/lbc_main.htm "Since 1995, Labatt been part of Belgium-based InBev S.A." I'm going to change the information in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sky Blu 2 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 03:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Labatt or Labatt's

The older commercials clearly show the label as being Labatt's. Today, everything says Labatt. Older: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HM4iQkAI9rw Newer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOyfLrZpU9o Please help a noob on the history of this company understand. Greenw47 (talk) 23:42, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

extra stock

I used to live in Detroit and we would go over to Windsor and there was a beer by labbatts called extra stock I was wondering if they still bottle that.216.145.90.162 (talk) 06:27, 10 September 2009 (UTC)