Talk:La Peña Cultural Center
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
File:Empanadas de horno.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Empanadas de horno.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC) |
Empanada picture
[edit]It's a chilean cultural center and you have a problem with a picture of an empanada, I think you are missing something here.LuciferWildCat (talk) 19:48, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- It's an empanada. This article is not about empanadas. Who gives a rat's ass whether they sell empanadas or not? It's an article about a cultural center. Earlier you had an image from a 1973 bombing--just as irrelevant. I'm seriously wondering if you know what this "Wikipedia" thing is: an encyclopedia. Look at WP:PERTINENCE: "Images must be relevant to the article that they appear in and be significantly and directly related to the article's topic." Drmies (talk) 01:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
This is a Chilean cultural center that was founded because of a coup in Chile. Imagery about Chilean Culture and relevant history seem to meet the bill. But fine, you know what? Since your being such a pest about it, I am going to go to La Pena and buy and empanada and take a picture of it, just to put up here in spite!LuciferWildCat (talk) 23:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, guys, I'm here from the 3O board. First of all, after looking at your profiles, it is clear you are both valuable contributors to Wiki. So, how about showing a little civility?? Surely a dispute over a photo of an empanada doesn't have to devolve into personal attacks. (I mean, it's not like we're fighting over something important, like Buñuelos or something;) . Anyhow, I'm going to have to side with Drmies here. Yes, I get there is some cultural significance to the empanada, but it's a bit too attenuated for purposes of this article. I think if you have a picture of the actual building, that would make much more sense here. Can we all be friends now?JoelWhy (talk) 17:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- I know it's weaksauce but since there is a lack of a better picture what remove this one?LuciferWildCat (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Knowing nothing about the Cultural Center, seeing that picture leads me to assume the place is a restaurant, or is somehow strongly identified with the food it makes. So, if the place were notable because they have a world-famous empanada, I would agree it fits. As it stands, however, it just seems out of place. I would argue no pic is better than a confusing pic (but, I can certainly see how someone could come to the opposite conclusion.)JoelWhy (talk) 21:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oh I understand your logic then, the place mostly does function as a restaurant as that is half the square footage, and the only aspect open during all business hours.LuciferWildCat (talk) 01:43, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Knowing nothing about the Cultural Center, seeing that picture leads me to assume the place is a restaurant, or is somehow strongly identified with the food it makes. So, if the place were notable because they have a world-famous empanada, I would agree it fits. As it stands, however, it just seems out of place. I would argue no pic is better than a confusing pic (but, I can certainly see how someone could come to the opposite conclusion.)JoelWhy (talk) 21:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- I know it's weaksauce but since there is a lack of a better picture what remove this one?LuciferWildCat (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)