Talk:La Crete

Canada: Alberta / Geography / Communities Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Return to La Crete

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move to La Crete.
I think this should be moved back to La Crete, Alberta as that appears to be the common name. I have only been able to find one reference to La Crête, Government of Alberta. At the same time the Govt. of Alberta has several links to La Crete. Also the reference in the article shows the name La Crete or, strangely, LaCrete, as does the Chamber of Commerce. There appears to be noting to support the use of the "ê" in the name. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 01:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support move to La Crete. Even if La Crête is the official spelling, I agree that the most common spelling appears to be La Crete and should be favoured. I would also remove the disambiguation, as per WP:CANSTYLE. This settlement, and institutions related to it, appears to be the primary use of the name and appears to be a unique place name. Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support move - if there's no little hat on my road map, most common usage is La Crete. CBW, here's another ref: StatsCan and enter "La Crete", searching in English no less. More than anything else, this speaks to not having those extra keys on the keyboard, however common usage overrides official usage, as long as it is noted in the article and the redirect exists. Franamax (talk) 23:54, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never thought to look at StatsCan for the information. Though their usage of names seems hit and miss, they get Gamèti, Northwest Territories correct, almost get Deline, Northwest Territories right but completely miss Lutselk'e, Northwest Territories here. Ulukhaktok, Northwest Territories here is listed under the older name of Holman but that was changed just an 11/2 months before the census. The official names for the places are found here.

Wow, I had no idea you could do so much with the letter "L" :) I suppose the difference is that StatsCan has English-French bilingual keyboards, so they can handle only those language spellings? (And yes, the northern community names are in flux right now, based on community votes, at least in Nunavut, I'm not clear on the exact process esp. Rankin and Chester) Franamax (talk) 03:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agh! A cheery morning to all, it's -3 C with 5 cm snow overnight and a 50 km wind giving a wind chill of -11 C. There has been some talk of few places changing. Nothing here though and I know that Cape Dorset, Nunavut has said that they won't change due to the brand name recognition. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 13:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was bold and moved the article to La Crete. After more than a month, there seemed to be no dispute as to the common name, and no one questioned the proposal to move it to the plain title as per WP:CANSTYLE.Skeezix1000 (talk) 12:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hey, the proposal was to move to La Crete, Alberta, not to undisambiguated title. WP:CANSTYLE refers to cities when it allows undisambiguated title, this is just an unincorporated hamlet. Please move back to official name La Crête, Alberta or to incorrect but more used La Crete, Alberta. --Qyd (talk) 15:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. Ucucha 03:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

La Crete → La Crete, Alberta — Per Qyd's comments above, the original move should have included the ", Alberta" suffix to maintain consistency with how all other Alberta community articles have the ", Alberta" suffix. As a result, La Crete should redirect to La Crete, Alberta, not the other way around. Why should La Crete be the exception to the convention implemented for all other Alberta communities? —Hwy43 (talk) 10:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I have moved it back to the plain title, as the 2010 move somehow slipped under the radar and so no one pointed out that it was completely contrary to the applicable naming convention. Hwy43, the editor who requested the 2010 move and was the only one who spoke to it, supports the move back to the correct article name. Cheers. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:48, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on La Crete. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120229060335/http://municipalaffairs.gov.ab.ca/documents/msb/2010-ruralmun.pdf to http://municipalaffairs.gov.ab.ca/documents/msb/2010-ruralmun.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unincorporated

Hey I changed the gov link in the infobox to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unincorporated_area#Canada — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.157.81.204 (talk) 01:36, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]