Talk:La Coupole/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 02:10, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Books need place of publication. Fix capitalization for Zaloga 2003 and spelling for Mississauga.
- Done. Prioryman (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- Books need place of publication. Fix capitalization for Zaloga 2003 and spelling for Mississauga.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Provide conversion for 6 ton.
- I'm not sure why it used that figure in the first place, I've changed it to the more conventional 12,000 lb (and the kg equivalent). Prioryman (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- Provide conversion for 6 ton.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
