Talk:La Celestina

Novels High‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Mid‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

dead reference

the jstor link in reference #3 is dead. could it please be updated, or at least provide journal name, vol/issue # so that the source can be found? Marionleenor (talk) 11:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picasso

Could you please add a link to Picasso who painted "la celestina", which is considered as the apogee of is blue period?

I noticed that there is a lot more information on the page in Spanish regarding this play than the page in English, so I've begun adding some of that info to expand this page.

English version is a first draft translation / Check out the Spanish

The subject line says it all. The English version is short and appears to be either written by someone who is not a native English speaker or by a native English speaker whose translation from the Spanish is "demasiado servil" (sorry, I can't make the accents work in this software). Check out the Spanish version. My German is not good enough to make comments on that version. If I have time later I will come back and try to improve this. Overall, this is a good introductory summary, but the Spanish is better.

I have started adding a section to the English version from the Spanish version. It is a translation and any help would be appreciated.--MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 18:57, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Summary is poor

As someone who has recently been studying the text, I can't say for sure if any of the statements in the summary are inaccurate (about the gold chain, etc) but they certainly miss some of the complexities. Clearly a draft and I may try to come back and check through it later, when I have a copy with me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.26.69.247 (talk) 15:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Figaro or Pandarus?

Chaucer's Pandarus is the origin of the English word "pander" and thus in English literature at least is both older and more widely influential than "Figaro" - Did Figaro originate as a character earlier than the 18th century? If not I would propose that Pandarus is a better male equivalent to Celestina than Figaro is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.16.28.233 (talk) 04:13, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on La Celestina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150322084034/http://books.google.com/books?printsec=frontcover to https://books.google.com/books?printsec=frontcover&id=C9vpRNgZMX8C

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]