Talk:LW6/8/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 18:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am starting a review on this article. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 18:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review comments

This is one of several "LW" articles which I'm reviewing at once, including recently adding 2 in response to editor request. One concern (clarification of defining body vs. classification bodies, and related terminology) runs across all of them, and we discussed at the LW3 review. IMO tweaks that I made here resolved this. North8000 (talk) 12:32, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A few times later in the article the bi-athlon / rifle shooting aspect is mentioned making me realize / think that such is a part of this, but it doesn't seem to be covered in the article. Should it be? North8000 (talk) 12:40, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The biathlon is a Nordic skiing event. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:03, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. North8000 (talk) 13:26, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In para-Nordic skiing, which includes the cross-country and biathlon events, this classification is grouped with other standing classes. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:00, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's what I was trying to ask about. Items later in the article indicate that this includes bi-athlons which are events what include skiing and shooting. There is good coverage of the skiing portion (equipment used, how they go about doing it etc.) but there seems to be no coverage of the shooting portion except a quick mention of rules. So on the face of it one might say that that part is missing from the article. And so I was trying to start a discussion (and get your thoughts) on whether or not that is the case; i.e. whether or not the article needs more coverage of that aspect in order to meet the criteria for full coverage of the topic. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 21:11, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Added a bit about Biathlon shooting technique and equipment. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:06, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Resolved North8000 (talk) 00:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider expansion of the title at a later date. North8000 (talk) 13:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria final checklist

Well-written

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 00:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Factually accurate and verifiable

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 00:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Broad in its coverage

Meets this criteria for its topic. North8000 (talk) 13:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 13:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 12:42, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by images

Meets this criteria. Has one image and one video; both are free so no article-specific use rationale is required. North8000 (talk) 12:26, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article

Congratulations. This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article. Nice work! Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 13:12, 27 March 2013 (UTC) Reviewer[reply]