Talk:LW4 (classification)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 18:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am starting a review on this article North8000 (talk) 18:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review comments

This is one of a group of 7 "LW" articles that I am reviewing at the same time. There is one item in common to all 7 which, rather than repeat, I located centralized discussion at the LW3 (classification) review. It concerns structure, governing body info and terminology for the standard and implementation of it. North8000 (talk) 19:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved with tweaks that I made. North8000 (talk) 01:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be feasible to get an image for this article? North8000 (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The team has not been able to find images for LW3 or LW4. We managed to snag images for all the other classes. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:40, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Then it meets the criteria as written. North8000 (talk) 13:05, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to consider an expansion of the title later, but IMO that is not an issue affecting the review result. North8000 (talk) 13:14, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria final checklist

Well-written

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Factually accurate and verifiable

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:10, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Broad in its coverage

Meets this criteria for the titled topic. North8000 (talk) 01:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by images

Has no images but meets this criteria as written. Editors have tried but have been unable to get images. North8000 (talk) 13:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article passes as a Wikipedia Good Article

This article passes as a Wikipedia Good Article. Congratulations! Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 13:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC) Reviewer[reply]