Talk:LSWR 0298 Class

Trains: in UK / Locomotives Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Size of class

The description of the class under the first paragraph of history seems to conflict with that at both:

which both imply a much larger class than this article (85 against 12). Presumably they count this article's "70 similar locomotives from Beyer, Peacock" as part of the class. I don't know enough to know which is the better way of looking at it.

Unfortunately there is no explicit cite for this paragraph, and although there are several book references there is no way of tying them to this part of the article. I've added cite needed tag, to try and help sort this out. -- Starbois (talk) 13:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully what I've done will help. Most of the Beyer Peacock engines came in batches of six. The chronology was 70 from Beyer Peacock 1863-71 (in 10 batches of 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 12, 8, 8), 3 from Nine Elms in 1872, 12 from BP in 1874-5 (2 batches of 6). Bradley's 1965 book makes no distinction between the last 12 and the earlier engines; however the three Nine Elms engines (33, 36, 76) and the final six from BP (44, 325-9 of 1875) incorporated detail differences - the six of 1874 (34,201/2/98/9,314) seem to have been similar to the first 70. The six 1889-94 rebuilds comprised locos built 1868/71/4/4/5/5, so were not confined to the last 12; although the final three survivors were, being built 1874/4/5. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:31, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LSWR 0298 Class. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110518214630/http://www.bodminandwenfordrailway.co.uk/steamlocos/30587.html to http://www.bodminandwenfordrailway.co.uk/steamlocos/30587.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]