Talk:LORAX
A fact from LORAX appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 August 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Travel(l)ing in the past
[edit]Hi Hydrargyrum-
Don't know if I'm posting this in the right place or not. A note: "traveled" and "travelled" are both accepted spellings. I think the second one, which I prefer but am not married to, may be more old-fashioned. I'm using this more as a chance to learn the edit/talk/discuss features than to launch a passionate defense of double-l-ing.
Eric 17:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- That's what the spelling check in Microsoft Word flagged, using the U.S. English dictionary. I spell it either way on occasion, too. If you don't like it, change it back. —QuicksilverT @ 17:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- No, it's fine. Was that the right procedure to put my comment here and get your attention via your talk page? And, once I've done that, is the etiquette that I revert your talk page to the previous version, or do I leave that to your discretion? --Eric 18:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- No need to change anything on my talk page. I tend to leave comments there, good or bad, as a running history. However, leaving a comment there to get my attention is OK. I don't watch all the pages I've edited, and may not return to look at them for months, if ever. So, the only way to get my attention regarding them is to leave something on my talk page so that I get alerted next time I log into Wikipedia. You can also send me a personal message via the "@" link in my signature. —QuicksilverT @ 06:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]Um ... don't look now, but ... this article is not about the Dr Suess character, as the tagline at the top suggests. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.2.115.228 (talk) 19:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
So, what happened then?
[edit]The article gives great detail on how the rover was tested on a Lake Michigan frozen lake in 2005 ... but what happened since then? What's the future plans for the project? I assume they intend to take it to Antarctica sometime. Any details on when? If not, say so ... and, how do they intend for it to get there without tampering with the projects and potentially contaminating results? Will a rocket send it into orbit, so it may be dropped onto Antarctica like a rover dropped onto any other frozen planet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.2.115.228 (talk) 19:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on LORAX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060822155502/http://www.ri.cmu.edu/projects/project_543.html to http://www.ri.cmu.edu/projects/project_543.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 14 December 2017 (UTC)