Talk:LNU Lightning Complex fires

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LNU Lightning Complex fires article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wildfire Low‑importance

	LNU Lightning Complex fires is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.WildfireWikipedia:WikiProject WildfireTemplate:WikiProject WildfireWildfire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LNU getting it's own article

I don't understand why this fire has it's own article. This article should be re-merged with the article for the 2020 California wildfires. 2601:644:8B00:DEF0:B83B:7D06:4F15:4968 (talk) 17:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to merge Hennessey Fire into LNU Lightning Complex fires

Consensus to merge. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 18:46, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Based on Dripwoods' suggestion, I am proposing that Hennessey Fire is merged into this article. The Hennessey Fire is the largest fire within the LNU Lightning Complex, and there is also plenty of content overlap between the two articles. The additional info found in the Hennessey Fire article can definitely be incorporated into this article. I don't see how the Hennessey Fire is any more notable than the LNU Lightning Complex as a whole, similar to how the Doe Fire (the largest fire in the August Complex) is covered by the article for the August Complex fire. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 22:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support – As the nominator, per my reasoning above. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 22:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Wildfire is large enough to have its own article. The Hennessey Fire section in the main article can have a link to the Henneessy Fire article a gd fan (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — per nom --🔥LightningComplexFire🔥 15:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Even Cal Fire decided to designate the Hennessy Fire as part of the LNU Lightning Complex. So following the example of Cal Fire, we should merge this article with the LNU Lightning Complex. Also, we should follow the precedent set by other articles. For instance, there is no article on the Ranch Fire, even though it made up the bulk of the acreage for the Mendocino Complex. Even on the August Complex, many of the large portions have no articles(just like LightandDark2000 reasons). Since there is no arguing on those pages, it is illogical we would have a dispute over this article. But as stated, I support merging this article with the LNU Lightning Complex. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:644:8900:A88:24D7:CFD9:58FD:802D (talk) 18:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Merge per article article fork/split guidelines. GenQuest ^"scribble" 05:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.