Jump to content

Talk:LHA (file format)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

LHA /LZH

[edit]

There is a link from LZH to this page. What is the exact relation from LHA to LZH. Is it only a synonym? -- 217.86.161.131 14:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LZH

[edit]

From what I remember of the 80's, LZH stood for Lempel-Ziff-Huffman, and referred to the compression methods employed by the archiving program. Many archiving programs would create .lzh files, but only LHarc would create .lha files, though it was possible for one decompressor to decompress both types of files, so they may have been identical, or similar enough for 8-bit computers to deal with it.

This Wikiepdia entry states that it was developed in 1988, but I'm not sure that date is completely accurate. I used LZH/LHA archives on my Commodore 64 for some time before I ended up switching from C-64 to IBM-XT in January, 1988. In fact, I remember being frustrated at not being able to find a decompressor for DOS that could read my C-64 .lzh text files.

[edit]

http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/outreach/dnloads/LZH_add-on.mspx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.109.22.148 (talk) 00:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sliding window?

[edit]

The article linked to an article called "Sliding Window", but that article just redirects to a different article about "Sliding window protocol", which is pertaining to communication technology, not file compression.

Could someone elaborate on this just a little bit in the article if possible, please? I am curious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.146.16.53 (talk) 18:08, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LHA (file format). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Y2K11 bug?

[edit]

I’ve tested this, packing a file with LHarc 2.13 under DOS. Both LHarc and lhasa on Unix render the date as having the current year. AIUI it only affects LHarc on the Amiga? mirabilos (talk) 18:39, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]