Talk:LGBTQ rights in Papua New Guinea

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Papua New Guinea Mid‑importance

	New Guinea portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Papua New Guinea, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Papua New Guinea on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Papua New GuineaWikipedia:WikiProject Papua New GuineaTemplate:WikiProject Papua New GuineaPapua New Guinea articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LGBT rights in Papua New Guinea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6IEmVxpKn?url=http://old.ilga.org/Statehomophobia/ILGA_State_Sponsored_Homophobia_2013.pdf to http://old.ilga.org/Statehomophobia/ILGA_State_Sponsored_Homophobia_2013.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:33, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

personal development

what rights do people have 103.14.91.90 (talk) 12:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Psychology of Gender

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 28 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aisre01 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Zisha68 (talk) 02:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merging Proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge; the arguements against focussed on independent notability, capacity for expansion and not being the same thing (perhaps alluding to the distinction between sexual identity and gender). Klbrain (talk) 20:48, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to propose merging Palopa into LGBT rights in Papua New Guinea.

Reason: Palopa is very short, and most of the information is already included in the "terminology" section of LGBT rights in Papua New Guinea. The sentence or 2 that is not included can easily be added. Rainsage (talk) 22:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I think there is benefit in keeping the pages separate, as description of terminology is not the same as a wider article on LGBT+ rights. Lajmmoore (talk) 12:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the length of the article is so short, that I don't think the topic is notable enough to warrant a separate page, especially because Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary Rainsage (talk) 04:48, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Length of article content is not a requirement of notability, the sources demonstrate notability Lajmmoore (talk) 20:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Article could be added to, but I don't think a merge is appropriate MarkiPoli (talk) 01:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why don't you think it would be appropriate? Rainsage (talk) 04:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't the same topic. This article is about rights, not LGBT people in general in PNG. There's three high quality sources (journals or published books), 1 lower but still adequate quality source (Stuff NZ), and two low quality sources (a glossary and a blog). I don't have access to the books, so I don't know if the mentions are WP:TRIVIAL, but they don't seem to be given the level of detail provided. This discussion is better served in an AfD discussion on Palopa, where merge is a potential outcome anyway. And just because an article is short, if high quality sources like books exist, it is hard to get an article deleted even if the content is not detailed enough. MarkiPoli (talk) 10:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Lajmmoore and MarkiPoli. term is notable in its own right and article length is not a reason to merge an article out of existence — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 06:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The article may be expanded in the future once someone has the expertise. It is a different topic from LGBT rights. Andrew Z. Colvin • Talk 20:54, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.