Talk:Lego

Specifically state which year ABS replaced Cellulose Acetate in the bricks

The article currently reads as follows under the 'History' section:

"In 1958, the modern brick design was developed; it took five years to find the right material for it, ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) polymer."

As phrased, this could imply that ABS was incorporated into the modern brick design in 1958. However, this is incorrect, as Cellulose Acetate was the main material used until 1963, which is when ABS replaced it. I'd recommend that the article is updated to prevent confusion.

Source: Lipkowitz, Daniel (2009). The LEGO® Book - Volume 1 (1st ed.). London: Dorling Kindersley. p. 21. ISBN 9781405341691. BenTedds42 (talk) 21:51, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

 Done ‍ Masterofthebrick ^{‍ talk} 09:09, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

poo Shimmeya (talk) 06:52, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Evaluating the article

Lead Section

The lead includes an introductory sentence which presents a concise overview of the product. The lead however, does not include a brief description of all the article's main sections. Overall, the lead section is clear and to the point by giving readers a brief introduction to the article.

Content

Everything in the article appears to be relevant to the topic. I was surprised to learn about the Robotics themes section which was a facet of the company I hadn't heard about prior to evavlutating this article. There was some missing content such as broken links to sources and an excerpt at the bottom of the article which is missing a citation necessary (shown as ^{[citation needed}). This article does not address topics related to historical underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone

The article tone is neutral. There are no claims that appear heavily biased. All groups seem to be equally represented, including clone businesses.

Sources and References

The sources support the claims within the article. Most links are active, but some are broken and the citation can no longer be accessed. The sources come from a wide array of authors and publications, however not all sources seem to be entirely reputable.

Talk Page

The conversations on the talk page are both respectful and helpful. There is a small stream of conversation about small changes to the article as well as enhancement suggestions. The article is rated C-class and is a level-4 vital article; Additionally it is of interest on multiple WikiProjects.

~~~~ Efl4ora (talk) 03:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

There ought to be a section entitled Cultural Impact, or something similar, as a place to group Lego movies along with Fan film productions like Death Star Canteen (an animated version of Eddie Izzard's standup routine).

This might also be the appropriate site for an exploration of how in UK and Commonwealth English, Lego is considered a mass noun with no plural form (the singular being Lego brick); whereas in US English, pieces of Lego collectively are known as Legos.

Nuttyskin (talk) 17:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Packaging in US

The company now has a facility for packaging in the United States which should be mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PossumOnWiki (talk • contribs) 23:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: NAS 348 Global Climate Change

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2024 and 29 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Watermelon888 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: NorthShoreLife.

— Assignment last updated by TotalSolarEclipse (talk) 17:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 April 2024

Change the line in second paragraph that states the following old information: As of July 2015, 600 billion Lego parts had been produced.

LEGO has been producing about 60 billion Lego parts per year, and the latest information should be reflected. It should be changed to:

As of April 2024, over 1 trillion Lego parts had been produced.

Bricks1000 (talk) 03:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. All the sources I can find about this seem to be quite spammy, to the extent where they appear to be "hey, lego hit 1 trillion parts, what about this other company recycling them?" in the headline. Not reliable to me. --Ferien (talk) 22:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

References