Talk:L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Move?

Life Goes On (song) → L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N. — Relisted. fuzzy510 (talk) 07:51, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the correct name of the song. See all of the refs. 212.159.45.2 (talk) 01:13, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Word styling unnecessary.--Labattblueboy (talk) 03:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Within the song, are the 10 initials an acronym? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:44, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. Regardless of how it is officially titled, readers searching for it are more likely to seek the ordinary spelling. The suggested target should be made into a redirect. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 16:32, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- How is it a common name? Can you provide any reliable sources where it is referred to as "Life Goes On"? 212.159.45.2 (talk) 21:05, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose MOS:TM -- playful typography/punctuation 65.95.14.96 (talk) 20:22, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't really see how that's relevant? This isn't a trademark. And furthermore if it was, per MOS:TM, "Using all caps is preferred if the letters are pronounced individually, even if they don't stand for anything.". 212.159.45.2 (talk) 23:32, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The song definitely shouldn't be at this title. If not moved to the target above, it should be moved to Life Goes On (Noah and the Whale song). There are a number of other songs with this name (see Life Goes On) and there is no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. This page should revert to being a redirect to the dab page as it was previously. Also, if you look up the lyrics (I won't provide a link to a WP:COPYVIO) the words "Life Goes On" don't actually appear in the song at all - when it is sung the letters are spelt out and there aren't gaps between the words. All sources I can find refer to the song as "L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N.". When played on the radio, DJs refer to it as L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N., spelling out the letters individually. I can't find ANY reliable sources which refer to the song as "Life Goes On". (I know it's obvious but) how do we even know that the letters L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N. actually refer to the words Life, Goes and On? Who's to say we should add spaces? If styling is an issue (I don't see why it is here - why shouldn't we style it in this way?), then surely it should be Lifegoeson or LIFEGOESON? If no other reliable sources refers to it by this name then neither should Wikipedia. Wikipedia is WP:NOTMADEUP. 212.159.45.2 (talk) 21:05, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- LIFEGOESON seems more appropriate, or L-I-F-E-G-O-E-S-O-N , there's no excess punctuation in the first, in the second it does not make it appear to stand for something. 65.95.14.96 (talk) 00:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N. is what it should be renamed to. It's referred to that on the artists web page (http://www.noahandthewhale.com/album.html). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.66.87.192 (talk) 12:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, it should be moved to L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N. as the band's official website and all media outlets refer to the song as L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N. such as- http://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/l-i-f-e-g-o-e-s-o-n-single/id414721175 . I do agree that it is unnecessary punctuation but L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N. is the name of the song, not Life Goes On
Done - moved. 狐 FOX 08:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wait for the outcome of the discussion! Skinsmoke (talk) 15:12, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone moved the page back to Life Goes On (song). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support The independent sources linked on the article (the Irish and British chart listings) use L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N. Converting this to Life Goes On appears to be original research. Much as I hate it, I have to agree with the proposed move! Skinsmoke (talk) 15:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Whether you like it or not, it's L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N. according to http://www.nme.com/news/nme-chart/55209 http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/reviews/noah-and-the-whale-koko-london-2220601.html http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/features/its-all-a-very-long-way-from-abbey-road-2224676.html http://gaffa.dk/nyhed/46860 http://www.revistamarvin.com/noticia.detalle.php?art_id=3123 http://detektor.fm/musik/keine-angst-vor-hits-folge-3/ http://www.ilikemusic.com/music_news/Jessie_J_Scores_First_UK_Number_One_Single-12222 ... 狐 FOX 22:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you actually listen to the song, the words "life goes on" are not said once. 狐 FOX 22:47, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see any argument for calling it 'Life Goes On'. Every credible source spells it as one word with initials. Anyway, if the title is considered to be 'Life Goes On', surely the 2Pac song is at least as notable?--MartinUK (talk) 12:22, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's fairly obvious that consensus is for moving the page. Dozens of reliable sources refer to the song in this way, as numerous people have pointed out. I shall move the page. 狐 FOX< /small> 21:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Its very clearly not obvious by reading the discussion above, in which you are one of the major proponents of the move. Please allow a neutral and uninvolved party close the discussion and make a decision. Unfortunately an admin now has to undo your hastiness. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 00:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Left at L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N.. This is the song title - "Life Goes On" is a reinterpretation of the title which, while being fairly obvious, is not supported by reliable sources, primary or secondary. Dcoetzee 01:23, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120915084445/http://www.ukchartsplus.co.uk/UKChartsPlusYE2011.pdf to http://ukchartsplus.co.uk/UKChartsPlusYE2011.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:14, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on L.I.F.E.G.O.E.S.O.N.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]