Talk:Kutte

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Metal

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal

Untitled

There's an image at the German wikipedia http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Kutte_Motorrad_vorn.jpg which probably be shown here as well. S Sepp 12:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ecto

Why do you feel that getting rid of the passive voice is important? I'd have thought it was actually quite appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Also, your edit did rather more than that, since it actually removed some chunks of text (unless the software is lying to me) rather than rewording them. Could you use more informative edit summaries in future? Thanks. Skittle 15:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not forget the motorcycle gangs which wear the same vests, but with their friendship patches and a big club-patch on the back. The vest show in this case often the nickname/gangname of the bearer. It is forbidden to wash the vest. If one loose the vest it is the same as loosing respect of the gang. (wrote: ex-gang member of a german mc club)

I'm Adding A Link To Kutta

Fellow Wikipedians,

This article may get somewhat vexing for readers especially those looking for Kutta (Hindi/Urdu: dog). The thing is, one popular term for kutta is its plural form, kutte. So basically, all I'm doing is adding a link to the Kutta page just to clear out the confusion for people arriving to WikiLand from Googleports. Thanks for all the coorperation(s).

Semi-Sincerely (as long as none of you guys screw up my link lolz),

Yahya Al-Shiddazi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.48.111.1 (talk) 16:51, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They're finding this page from where? Kutta is just a dab page that says it means dog. But the bottom line is we do not want to add hatnotes for every English word that means something different in some other language. In this case, it's not even the same word; only the plural of a similar word. If there is an erroneous link coming into this page on some other website, the problem is there, not here. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Listen bro. Listen once, and listen carefully (no offensive language intended, just kinda frustrated): Jeff3000 gave me the heads up to do this. He's a WikiAdmin. This is a serious problem and we've found the solution. "Kutte" and "kutta" aren't simply some dumb stinky Indian words-- they are very common. If ya don't believe me, jus look 'em up on the Urban Dictionary. Thanks. Badbye now, --Yahya Al-Shiddazi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.48.111.1 (talk) 17:07, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia follows reliables sources, not self-published content such as Urban Dictionary. We do not disambiguate non-English words. Some Hinid words are loan words in English, or in this case, kutta is a loan word from German. But the Hindi word for dog is not a loan word in English. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:15, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Bratland is correct. IP user, please participate on this talk page in a mature way rather than edit warring your desired outcome and vandalizing the encyclopedia. Lagrange 613 18:13, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]