Talk:Kuselan/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC) I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

This article is in very poor shape. The grammar is extremely poor, it needs a thorough copy-edit. It appears to be a poor translation into English.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Very badly written, see above.

The Lead does not fully summarise the article, please read WP:LEAD

Contradiction: The lead states that Rajinikanth siad he was making a guest appearance, but the Development section says he was cast in a lead role.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): Two dead links were tagged using WP:CHECKLINKS, another was fixed from an archive source.
What makes ref #7 [1] a reliable source? The reference is badly formatted as well

What makes ref #14 [2] a reliable source - it claims to be a "social netwroking utility"

What makes ref #16 [3] a reliable source?

What makes ref #21 [4] a reliable source?
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The image in the infobox box needs a caption. I query why an album cover is being used in the infobox to illustrate a film?
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
The prose is extremely poor as mentioned above. See if you can get someone else tp copy edit. The WP:Guild of Copyeditors may be able to help. There are also referencing issues. I shall place this on hold for seven days, if you cannot fix it in that time the article will not be listed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:48, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As the nominator has removed the article from the list at WP:GAN, I shall close this review as not listed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]