Talk:Kuru (kingdom)

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Kuru realm: Black and red Ware or Painted Grey Ware Culture?

I think it must be clarified if Kuru realm belongs to BRW or PGW. As far as I know it belongs to PGW. Sites like Hastinapura has PGW and no BRW. I would like the sources for putting BRW in the article. Thank you

There is a kuruba community in Southern India. Many ancient dynasties of south India like Pallava, Hoysala, Sangama of Vijayanagara Empire etc are supposed to be from this clan. Their is a belief and practices of ancestor worship like worshiping badaganadaiah ( god from North etc) along with Beeralingeswara. May be research into genealogy of these people would give more truth to the Indian History.TT 22:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Reference

This page does not have any reference. Without any reference the content is not verifiable. --UB 11:30, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh POV

The view that the Kurus were from Central Asia is contradicted by the new debunking of the supposed "Aryan invasion 
of India" which never happened. Thus, the Indo-Aryan Kurus were not from Central Asia or Europe or anywhere outside 
India for that matter. Ancient Indian texts mention no geographical references outside India and it is prepostrous 
to assume that the Ganga refer to anything but the Ganga in India. If texts are to be interpreted that way, no 
geographical reference can be accepted. The Himalayas will become a Central Asian mountain range!

Needs to be removed but I am not familiar enough with this topic to rewrite it myself.

the usual polemic BS, just remove. dab (ᛏ) 09:31, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. WHy this pathetic need to identify with Iran and Central Asia. India was a distinct and powerful civilisation whose culture was unique. Also any migration could have been the other way. India did rule Afghanistand and parts of Iran and Central Asia during the later Mauryan period

Kaurava not Kuru

Shouldn't this really be at Kaurava Kingdom, as I believe Kaurava refers to descendants or anything else "of Kuru", whereas Kuru was just the name of an ancestral King of the Candravamsha? --Grammatical error 20:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]